Indian Penal Code IPC - Penal Code IPC laws 1860 Indian Bare Acts at Vakilno1.com, a website for Indian Laws and bareacts, legal advice and law documents. ABETMENT (INDIAN PENAL CODE,1860) BY PRANSHU SINHA Under the Penal Code a person becomes liable as an abettor if he instigates another to commit a crime, or engages in a conspiracy with another to commit a crime and some act is done in furtherance of such conspiracy or if he intentionally aids another in order to facilitate the commission of a crime. The term ‘abet’ in general usage means to assist, advance, aid, conduce, help and promote. In Kartar Singh v/s State of Punjab Supreme Court has word ‘abet’ has been defined as “meaning to aid; to assist or to give aid; to command, to procure, or to counsel; to countenance; to encourage; induce, or assist, to encourage or to set another one to commit.” Chapter V of the IPC talks about ‘Abetment’ and provides the relevant laws covering the responsibility of all those considered in law to have abetted the commission of offence. Section 107 of IPC which defines abetment generally, defines three kinds of abetment, or as they are referred to ‘Ingredients of an amendment’ viz., [Sec. 107(1)] – Abetment by Instigation i.e. By instigating a person to commit an offence; or Abetment by conspiracy [Sec. 107(2)] – by engaging in a conspiracy to commit an offence; or Abetment by aid [Sec. 107(3) – by intentionally aiding a person to commit an offence. Section 108 of Indian penal code defines who an abettor is. For an act to be regarded as abetment it is not necessary that the offence abetted must occur or an illegal omission of an act even if the abettor was not himself bound to do the act. Illustrations • Andy instigates Sam to murder Charlie. Sam refuses to do so. Andy is guilty of abetting Sam t o commit murder. • Raj instigates Shyam to murder Balram. Shyam in pursuance of the instigation stabs Balram but he recovers from the wound. Raj is guilty of instigating Shyam to commit murder. • P and Q conspire to poison Z. P, in pursuance of the conspiracy, procures the poison and delivers it to Q in order that he may administer it to Z. Q, in pursuance of the conspiracy administers the poison to Z in P’s absence and thereby causes Z’s death. Here Q is guilty of murder. P is guilty of abetting that offence by conspiracy, and is liable to the punishment for murder. It is not necessary that the person who is abetted to commit a crime has knowledge or is capable by law to commit that crime or shares the same guilty purpose/knowledge thereof. Therefore if a person abets a minor or a mentally unstable person to commit a crime, the abettor would be responsible for the offence under this section even if the crime has not been committed. Relevant case laws on Abetment In Jamuna Singh v. Gokusen season 3 sub indo lets. State of Bihar This was a case of abetment of fabrication of false evidence. Accused pleaded that the fabrication had not taken place and hence he was not guilty. Penal Code IndiaCourt held that the offence of abetment is complete when the alleged abettor has instigated another or engaged with another in a conspiracy to commit the offence. It is not necessary for the offence of abetment that the act abetted must be committed. State of Kerala A young woman, Jameela, was found killed. 3000 sound effects pack torrent. At the time of her death, the deceased was in advance stage of pregnancy. Upon trial the two accused were found guilty of the offences of murder and abetment. The Supreme court held that there is no direct evidence either regarding abetment or the criminal conspiracy attributable to the appellant. Both the offences are held to be proved on the basis of circumstantial evidence. The court further held that to prove the charge of abetment, the prosecution is required to prove that the abettor had instigated for the doing of a particular thing or engaged with one or more other person or persons in any conspiracy for the doing of that thing or intentionally aided by an act of illegal omission, doing of that thing. The prosecution failed to prove the existence of any of the ingredients of S.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |